Clause 6.1 of ISO 14001 asks an organisation to plan actions to address risks and opportunities within its Environmental Management System. In plain English, this is where the organisation identifies what could affect EMS success, then decides what needs to be done about it.
Clause 6.1 is the main planning sequence for dealing with risks and opportunities in an Environmental Management System.
It brings together several important planning topics:
The purpose is to make sure the organisation does not simply identify environmental issues, legal duties or business risks, then leave them sitting in separate registers. The organisation should understand what matters, decide what action is needed, and integrate those actions into the EMS.
Clause 6.1 is one of the most important parts of ISO 14001 because it drives the planning logic of the EMS.
If this part is weak, the rest of the EMS may become weak too.
For example:
A strong Clause 6.1 process gives the EMS direction. It helps the organisation decide what needs attention, what needs control, what needs improvement, and what needs monitoring.
Clause 6.1 sits inside Clause 6, which is the planning section of ISO 14001.
It takes information from earlier clauses, including:
It then feeds into later parts of the EMS, including:
In other words, Clause 6.1 is not a stand-alone paperwork exercise. It is the planning engine that should influence how the EMS works.
Clause 6.1.1 is the general starting point for this planning sequence.
It asks the organisation to consider its context, interested parties, EMS scope, environmental aspects, compliance obligations, and risks and opportunities. The aim is to ensure the EMS can achieve its intended outcomes, prevent or reduce unwanted effects, address relevant environmental conditions and support continual improvement.
For learners and auditors, Clause 6.1.1 is best understood as the “setting up the planning logic” clause. It does not usually need to be audited in isolation. Instead, auditors should check whether the organisation’s planning is genuinely connected to the issues, obligations, environmental conditions and risks that matter.
Clause 6.1.1 is where the organisation should show joined-up thinking. If the context review identifies flooding as a major issue, or customers expect carbon reporting, those issues should be visible somewhere in aspects, risks, obligations, actions, objectives, controls or management review.
Clause 6.1.2 asks the organisation to identify environmental aspects and determine which can have significant environmental impacts.
Environmental aspects are the ways the organisation’s activities, products or services interact with the environment. Impacts are the environmental changes that result, or could result.
Examples include:
The organisation should consider normal operations, abnormal conditions, emergency situations, lifecycle perspective, and activities it can control or influence.
Read the detailed SQMC guide to environmental aspects and impacts.
Clause 6.1.3 asks the organisation to determine its compliance obligations and understand how they apply to its environmental aspects.
Compliance obligations include legal requirements and other requirements the organisation must, chooses to, or has agreed to meet.
These may include:
These obligations should not sit in isolation. They should influence controls, competence, monitoring, evaluation of compliance and management review.
Read the detailed SQMC guide to compliance obligations.
Clause 6.1.4 asks the organisation to determine the risks and opportunities that need to be addressed within the EMS.
Risks and opportunities may arise from:
Risks are potential negative effects. Opportunities are potential positive effects. Both should be considered where they could affect the EMS and its intended outcomes.
Read the detailed SQMC guide to risks and opportunities.
Clause 6.1.5 asks the organisation to plan actions to address significant environmental aspects, compliance obligations, and risks and opportunities.
This is where planning becomes practical. The organisation should decide:
The key audit question is: did the organisation do something useful with the planning information?
Read the detailed SQMC guide to planning action.
Clause 6.1 should create a clear planning trail.
A practical sequence might look like this:
This joined-up logic is more important than the format of the records.
A warehouse identifies fuel use as an environmental aspect. The impact is greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution. Customer carbon-reporting requirements are identified as compliance obligations. Risks include poor fuel efficiency and unreliable data. Opportunities include route optimisation and driver awareness. Actions are planned through monitoring, driver briefings and route review. Results are evaluated through fuel data and management review.
Auditors look for evidence that the organisation has identified relevant EMS planning issues and taken appropriate action.
Evidence may include:
Do not audit each register separately and stop there. Follow trails. Pick one significant aspect, one compliance obligation and one risk or opportunity. Check whether each one leads to meaningful action and evidence of effectiveness.
“The organisation has an aspect register, a legal register and a risk register.”
This is weak because it only proves documents exist. It does not show whether the organisation has connected aspects, obligations, risks, opportunities and actions into a working EMS planning process.
“The organisation identifies environmental aspects, determines significant impacts, links relevant compliance obligations, evaluates EMS risks and opportunities, plans actions, integrates those actions into operational controls and objectives, and reviews effectiveness through monitoring, audit and management review.”
This is stronger because it shows Clause 6.1 working as a connected planning sequence.
A manufacturing company identifies chemical storage as a significant environmental issue.
A joined-up Clause 6.1 process might show:
An auditor could test this by following the evidence trail from aspect identification to operational control and performance review.
An office-based organisation identifies business travel, energy use, IT equipment disposal and procurement as relevant EMS issues.
A practical Clause 6.1 process might show:
This shows that Clause 6.1 applies to service organisations as well as industrial sites.
This page is part of SQMC’s ISO 14001:2026 guidance library for auditors, managers and QHSE professionals.
SQMC’s ISO 14001 Internal Auditor course helps you move from understanding the Standard to auditing it with confidence. Over two practical days, you’ll learn how to plan EMS audits, gather evidence, ask better questions, write nonconformities and report findings clearly.
Learn from anywhere in our Virtual Classroom, attend one of our training centres, or arrange private in-company training for your team.
Find out more and get qualified!